The introduction of a competency certificate for third molar surgical intervention has divided the professional community in Singapore and has once again brought into focus the question: where lies the boundary between patient protection and the ability of practicing physicians to develop advanced surgical skills. The Singapore Dental Council (SDC) announced in July an initiative that will become the first stage of a phased implementation of competency accreditation for high-risk dental procedures. Although certification is not mandatory, the council recommends physicians engaged in the removal of third molars to undergo specialized training beyond basic preparation and to work exclusively within the scope of their competence.
Dentists who have completed an SDC-approved course may apply for an initial three-year accreditation. The program must be completed within six months and includes a minimum of 8 hours of theoretical training, observation of at least one operation, and no fewer than five supervised clinical cases, assessed as satisfactory. To obtain permanent accreditation after the initial period, physicians must provide evidence of performing a minimum of 30 third molar extractions over these three years.
The framework also defines which cases of mandibular third molars are considered suitable for training. More complex impactions — including those with deep retention or proximity to the mandibular canal — are outside the scope of the program and are recommended for treatment by oral and maxillofacial surgeons.
The Singapore Dental Association supported the goal of enhancing patient safety; however, it criticized the restrictive nature of the framework. In a letter published in August, the association’s president Dr Eugene Tang noted that the exclusion of complex cases “creates a potential ceiling” for development, leaving physicians without “a defined pathway for professional growth through further education, mentorship, and supervised experience”.
Tang emphasized the need for greater dialogue with professionals and warned against overemphasis on the volume of procedures. In his view, clinical experience is important, but professional development should also take into account proper case selection, clinical judgment, outcomes, and continuing education.
The SDC responded that the threshold of 30 cases is only one aspect of the assessment. Accreditation also considers the quality and range of clinical experience, proper supervision, professional judgment, and compliance with practice standards. The council indicated that feedback from physicians and professional organizations will be used in further refinement of the system.
Local media note a heterogeneity of positions among stakeholders: experienced physicians question how the system recognizes already existing qualifications, while leaders of dental clinics see in a uniform standard an advantage for developing physician confidence and reducing unwarranted referrals to specialists. The Singapore Ministry of Health stated that the framework will be regularly reviewed based on accumulated experience from the program’s implementation.
Dental implant manufacturer Osstem is preparing a comprehensive educational and exhibition program for the 33rd annual congress of the European
The 33rd annual congress of the European Association for Osseointegration (EAO) will be held from September 24 to 26 in
OTEXE.COM uses cookies to personalize the services and improve the usability of the site. If you do not want to use cookies, please disable them in your browser settings.
